This page last modified: 16 July 2014 (Many changes starting from March 2014...)
The following units are listed as being under the overall command of the Master of the Foot:
12 Legiones palatinae:
65 Auxilia palatina:
32 Legiones comitatenses:
Legio Prima Alpina
This should make 127 units all-told, but the 65 units of auxilia palatina are problematic. The Atecotti iuniores Gallicani is not actually listed in the manuscripts, and was interpolated by Seeck, because its shield pattern is clearly illustrated in the corresponding place (as the Atecotti iuniores; it is called the Atecotti iuniores Gallicani in the Magister Equitum's Gallic command list). See here for some commentary by Ingo Maier. Note also that Seeck listed three units, the Batavi seniores, Mattiaci seniores, and Mattiaci iuniores, for what appear to be just two units, the Batavi matriciaci seniores and the Mattiaci iuniores, listed in the manuscripts (see page 20 of Ingo Maier's notes). Further, the 'Batavi iuniores' in between the Invicti iuniores Britanniciani and the Exculcatores iuniores Britanniciani is not actually listed in any of the manuscripts, but its shield pattern and accompanying label is. As a shield pattern labelled 'Batavi' is depicted in the correct place for the actually-listed Batavi iuniores, that labelled 'Batavi iuniores' would seem to correspond to some other unit. As it is sandwiched between two other 'British' units, it might well be the missing 'Britones' recorded as serving under the Master Equitum in his Gallic command rather than one of the other units mentioned above as present but not illustrated. That its full name was Batavi iuniores Britanniciani is not beyond the realm of possibility.
The Tertia Italica of Seeck are actually listed as the Tertiani siue tertia italica in the manuscripts (i.e. "Tertiani or Tertia Italica"); likewise the Secunda Britannica are actually listed as Legio secundae britannicae siue secundani; and the Flavia victrix Constantina are actually listed as Flaviae victrices constantinae id est constantici.
The units' shield patterns are illustrated below from top to bottom, left to right, in the order given above, using the Bodleian manuscript pictures, except that only one pattern is given for Seeck's supposedly two Mattiaci units; the three contiguous units Exculcatores seniores, Sagittarii Tungri and Exculcatores iuniores are not illustrated; the Brachiati iuniores is also not illustrated.
It should be noted that there seems to be a mismatch between the shield patterns and the names accompanying them starting from the problematic Mat(t)iaci. It is apparent that the shields labelled Matiaci and Ascarii seni(ores) are essentially identical. Either they have been accidentally duplicated, or belong to two related units. Duplication is easy for text, but barely conceivable for such an elaborate illustration. If the shield labelled Ascarii seni(ores) in fact belongs to the "missing" Mattiaci iuniores, then the shield patterns should be shifted along one position. This means the two Ascarii units have similar shields; the two Leones units similar shields, etc. See here for more details.
The Taurunenses and the Antianenses are unassigned to any of the various officers; they both appear to be units drawn from the Dux Pannoniae secundae. The Antianenses would have come from Antiana; modern Ban in Hungary. They might, as Jones indicates, have something to do with the Comes Illyricum, given they are positioned under other units in his command. The Augustei are similarly unassigned, and would also appear to come from the Dux Pannoniae secundae.
Below are the corresponding pictures from the Paris manuscript:
And below are the corresponding pictures from the Munich manuscript: each respective page from the first portion first, then the second.
Return to the Notitia index page.