本文へスキップ
HOME PAPER 2 PAPER 3 PAPER 4
☆☆☆☆ Click the pdf icon for download of the full text! (Open access.)
Full text: pdf (2.64MB)






Limits and Regularity of Morphological Variations in Our Species:
Ecological Correlations between Craniofacial Measurements
and Environmental Variables

By

Yuji Mizoguchi
Physical Anthropologist
E-mail: y-mzgc@asahi.email.ne.jp

Abstract    The main purposes are to confirm the limits and regularity of among-group variations in the craniofacial morphology of Homo sapiens sapiens, and, if possible, to determine some of the causes for the regularity. As regards the among-group variation limits, it was found that the principal component (PC) scores for the mean vectors of craniofacial measurements in almost all the samples were located within the ±2 standard deviation ranges of the within-group PC scores based on a single sample. This finding suggests some complicated system or factors controlling the coordination between substructures of the skull (or the body). The principal component analyses (PCAs) of among-group correlations between craniofacial measurements clearly indicate the existence of significant common factors, namely, the robust evidence for regularity in the inter-population variations of craniofacial morphology. In the PCAs of among-group correlations between craniofacial measurements and environmental variables, it was found that cranial breadth, upper facial height, bizygomatic breadth, and nasal height tended to be larger in colder regions of higher latitudes; that basi-bregmatic height and nasal breadth tended to be larger and, inversely, minimum frontal breadth tended to be smaller in the regions more distant from Ethiopia and of lower latitudes where average precipitation was higher and average temperature was also relatively high; and that cranial length and cranial base length tended to be larger in ancient times (for the past 7,000 years). These findings, especially on temperature, precipitation and humidity, were interpreted as the results of our evolutionary adaptation to environments. Path analyses, together with PCAs, suggest the existence of unknown factors for every craniofacial measurement dealt with here. In conclusion, the purposes of the present study were partly achieved. But we must still collect more data of various environmental factors, natural and artificial (cultural, social, etc.) and ancient and modern, to clarify the causality for the formation process of our morphology.


Keywords:   Homo sapiens, Skull, Adaptation, Genetic drift, Limb bones, Temperature, Precipitation, Humidity, Chronological age, Latitude, Great circle distance, Principal component analysis, Bootstrap method, Rank correlation, Path analysis 



CONTENTS