Late Roman Shield Patterns

Dux provinciae Tripolitanae

This page last modified: 30 December 2014 (Frontpiece pictures added)


Frontpiece showing towns
Above: Frontpiece from the Parisian manuscript (P).
The stations depicted are: Talalatensis, Thentettani,
Buzerentane, Tillibarensis, Madensis, Maccomadensis
Tintiberitani, Bubensis, Mamucensis, Basensis
Varensis, Leptitanis, Madensis, Sarcitani.
The following commanders and their stations are listed as being under the command of the Duke of the Province of Tripolitania (the numbers beside the names refer to Ingo Maier's numbering scheme):

139.2 Praepositus limitis Talalatensis
139.3 Praepositus limitis Tenthettani
139.4 Praepositus limitis Bizerentane
139.5 Praepositus limitis Tillibarensis
139.6 Praepositus limitis Madensis
139.7 Praepositus limitis Maccomadensis
139.8 Praepositus limitis Tintiberitani
139.9 Praepositus limitis Bubensis
139.10 Praepositus limitis Mamucensis
139.11 Praepositus limitis Balensis
139.12 Praepositus limitis Varensis
139.13 Milites Fortenses in castris Leptitanis (no commander given)
139.14 Milites Munifices in castris Madensibus (no commander given)
139.15 Praepositus limitis Sarcitani
Except for the two units of Milites ("milites" simply means "soldiers"), no names are given to these detachments, only their locations. Being limitanei units, no shield patterns are given either.

Disclaimer: Remember, a lot of what comes below is speculation. Hopefully informed speculation, but speculation nonetheless. Comments welcome! (lukeuedasarson "at"

The Milites Fortenses would appear to be a detachment of the Fortenses listed (98/9.129) as the last of the legiones comitatenses in the Magister Peditum's infantry roster and assigned to the command of the Comes Africae. Munifices simply means "privates" - soldiers that were not specifically exempted from ordinary fatigues, and the Milites Munifices probably represents another detachment of the same legion (it is possible that since no commanders are given for these detachments, they might have been under the command of the officer list immediately above them, the Praepositus limitis Varensis). Note that "Praepositus" was a position in the Roman army - a commander of a (detachment of a) unit, and not a substantive rank like "Praefectus" or "Tribunus", in much the same way any commander of a modern naval ship may be called "captain", while very few such captains hold the rank of "captain". The men under the Praepositus limitis Fortensis under the Dux et praeses provinciae Mauritaniae et Caesariensis might well be another detachment of the same legion. The shield pattern of the Fortenses under the Comes Africae as shown in various manuscripts is as below:

Fortenses (Africa)

Whether this pattern was borne by the various limitanei detachments listed in the African provinces might depend on whether the detachments were detached from the unit in the field army, or the field army unit joined the field army from a garrison position: there is plenty of evidence in the Notitia to suggest that units were given new shield patterns when they joined a field army.

Note that in addition to the above mentioned units, various other units named Fortenses appear in the Notitia:

9.20 Fortenses, a legio palatina under the Magister Militum Praesentalis I,
15.28 Fortenses auxiliarii, a pseudocomitatenses unit under the Magister Militum per Orientem,
80.2 Dalmatae Fortenses, a cuneus of equites under the Dux Daciae ripensis,
98/9.99 Fortenses, a legio comitatenses unit under the "Comes" Hispenias,
132.2 Fortenses, a numerus under the Comes litoris Saxonici per Britanniam, and
143.6 Fortenses, a cuneus of equites under the Dux Provinciae Valeriae ripensis.
In addition, there is the 143.27 Fortensia, a unit of auxilia under the Dux Provinciae Valeriae ripensis. It is the relative positioning of the two legiones comitatenses Fortenses units within their provincial lists that indicates which one is which: the Spanish unit is the first of the legions listed in the Spanish list, and thus should correspond to the more highly-positioned unit in the Magister Peditum's infantry roster; while the African unit is the last in the African list, and thus should correspond to the more lowly-positioned unit in the Magister Peditum's infantry roster.


Below are the frontpieces from the second half of the Munich manuscript (W) and the Froben edition (B).

Frontpiece showing towns Frontpiece showing towns

Both of these sets of pictures show the hexagonal style of fort illustrations that is believed to have been present in the lost Codex Spirensis from which all the extent manuscript copies are ultimately derived. Those of B show clear 16th-century renaissance embellishments to the styling, while those of W are clear of such anachronisms. Below are the corresponding frontpieces from the first half of the Munich manuscript (M) and the Bodleian manuscript (O).

Frontpiece showing towns Frontpiece showing towns
The M pictures bear very little resemblance to those of W, and display imagery typical of the mid-16th century Germany. The similarity in style, if not in details of the O pictures to those of P is clear. That the details are executed with a little more care in O is evidence that the artists were not one and the same, even if they did belong the same "school" (see Maier, I.G., The Barberinus and Munich codices of the 'Notitia Dignitatum omnium': Latomus 28 1969 pp. 960-1035; available here; at page 1022 in particular). The style is 15th-century Italian, or Savoyard to be more exact.

Return to the Notitia index page.